Another scientist with insightful comments in opposition to the airport full-body X-ray image scanners.
Regards,
proclus
http://www.gnu-darwin.org/
The GNU-Darwin Blackout Blog
http://www.gnu-darwin.org
Another scientist with insightful comments in opposition to the airport full-body X-ray image scanners.
Regards,
proclus
http://www.gnu-darwin.org/
Thought that some of you might like a look at the home page of the X-ray facility that I manage. I am in the midst of updating the facility progress table. Hopefully we will have current data there soon. Forecast sunny ;-}. Here is the link.
http://biophysics.med.jhmi.edu/xtal/
Regards,
proclus
http://www.gnu-darwin.org/
It is incorrect to say that X-rays bounce off the body. X-rays are noted for their ability to penetrate the body, and a small fraction bounces off. The exposure numbers that have been produced by the current crop of public scanner defenders are absurdly low, and they are also inconsistent with the TSA commissioned study, which indicates that the X-ray dose is low but significant. Critics have countered further that the exposure in the study was underestimated, and I am inclined to agree. The level of radiation that is required to resolve a backscatter image is not insignificant, and likely amounts to a substantial dose. Further study is indicated, but we should not forget that the aim is to eliminate the scanners from our airports.
If you have a comparable exposure from in-flight radiation, this is another reason not to fly. If the in-flight exposure is higher, then you have more reason not to fly. There are many good reasons not to fly, which have been building up over the decades, such as the pollution, the fuel cost and utilization, the greenhouse effect, the terrorist threat, and the adverse reaction that we see in US foreign and domestic policy. All of this to say nothing of the Fourth Amendment violation, which is a daily occurrence in our airports. Much has been made of the fact that the machines are not configured to save images. Is the operator monitored to be sure that he is not taking a picture of the screen with his cell phone? Do we really believe that modifying the software could resolve the underlying privacy issue?
Supporters of the scanner technology tend to dodge the question of long term effects, and this is no surprise. If I were them, I would dodge it too. The long term effects are likely to be devastating for the unlucky few who get various cancers and other maladies from these scanners, to say nothing about vulnerable subpopulations, such as smokers, pregnant women, children, and people with pre-existing conditions such as; cancer and thyroid problems. What about the male germ-line cells, which can be expected to receive a larger dose than the rest of the body. X-rays are known to be mutagenic.
The truth is that this technology was promoted by vocal and powerful wealthy minority that values airport security over our health and safety. Their aim is that we take all the risk, and they enrich themselves by taking all the benefit. The rest of us should band together and put a stop to these outrages now. I am seeing widespread opposition to the new security measures across a very wide base which transcends many other issues. Act now, and we can stop this. Act now, or you will see the scanners in schools, banks, and other public places. Act now, or else they will become ubiquitous and unavoidable, everywhere.
If you are ready for action, here are some suggestions that you may not have thought of. If you must continue to fly, complain to the TSA and Homeland Security, and ask them to stop these practices. Voice your opposition to TSA officers. Stop flying altogether and send the right message to the airlines. Don't be fooled by the false dichotomy between scanning and groping. Refuse both. If you are TSA officer, stop what you are doing, because it is a Fourth Amendment violation. Refuse to indulge in this wrongful and unpopular act. If you are a federal officer, obey your oath and defend the Constitution against this outrage. Everyone should spread their dissatisfaction to everyone else that they know. THINK, and come up with your own actions. Act now, not later.
Regards,
proclus
http://www.gnu-darwin.org/
I just took action and asked world leaders to create a Global Climate Fund that would help support farmers the world over.
While some tools and funds already exist, they are scattered and often reach the most vulnerable when it's too late. A Global Fund would help farmers keep their livelihoods sustainable, and could make a difference for poor communities throughout the world. Can you ask our leaders to support this critical fund? https://secure.oxfamamerica.org/site/Advocacy?cmd=display&page=UserAction&id=1185
To take action on this issue, click on the link below:
http://act.oxfamamerica.org/site/Advocacy?s_oo=vgIyMlsZ6GR2KMd2Jq-mlQ..&i... If the text above does not appear as a link or it wraps across multiple lines, then copy and paste it into the address area of your browser.
Glenn Beck just targeted CREDO Action and the progressive groups they
support.
We have to send a strong message to Beck, that we progressives won't be
intimidated. And we're not afraid to stand up for progressive values or
the groups who fight for them.
Join me and thousands of other CREDO members in telling Beck that he will
not scare us into silence. For every person who signs, CREDO will donate
$.25 to five groups Beck absolutely hates.
http://act.credoaction.com/campaign/credo_on_beck/?r_by=-3052123-sZgASgx&rc=c...
Regards,
proclus
http://www.gnu-darwin.org/
Regards,
proclus
http://www.gnu-darwin.org/
In any other country, the current American bribe to Israel, and the latter's reluctance to accept it, in return for even a temporary end to the theft of somebody else's property would be regarded as preposterous. Three billion dollars' worth of fighter bombers in return for a temporary freeze in West Bank colonisation for a mere 90 days? Not including East Jerusalem – so goodbye to the last chance of the east of the holy city for a Palestinian capital – and, if Benjamin Netanyahu so wishes, a rip-roaring continuation of settlement on Arab land. In the ordinary sane world in which we think we live, there is only one word for Barack Obama's offer: appeasement. Usually, our lords and masters use that word with disdain and disgust.
GNU-Darwin line down. Offline. This will take a while. Sorry for any inconvenience.
As usual, we expect major problems with the ACTA treaty. Here is some info from Public Knowledge about the current text. I am also posting a link to the notes I published regarding last month's ACTA revision to the twitter. Here is the link for your convenience. More on this later.
proclus: #ACTA notes - #drm #law #dmca #coica #music #freedom #downloads #internet #software #technology http://xi.nu/gd369
Regards,
proclus
http://www.gnu-darwin.org/
Today the United States Trade Representative (USTR) released the finalized text of the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA), claiming to smooth out disagreements among the negotiating parties. However, our concerns with respect to some provisions remain. I had outlined these concerns in my previous post. Here are the changes in the new text.
Regards,
proclus
http://www.gnu-darwin.org/
Regards,
proclus
http://www.gnu-darwin .org/
What do you want to bet that this water contamination results from natural gas drilling? Some of the article comments are in agreement with this idea.
Regards,
proclus
http://www.gnu-darwin.org/
Texas officials charged with protecting the environment and public health have for years made arbitrary subtractions to the measured levels of radiation delivered by water utilities across the state, according to a series of investigative reports out of Houston.
Those subtractions, based on the test results’ margin of error, made all the difference for the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ): without the reduction, demonstrated levels of dangerous radiation would have been in excess of federal limits for years.
This was being done in direct contravention of an order by the US Environmental Protection Agency, which told state regulators in 2000 to stop subtracting the margin of error.
The findings are part of an investigation by Houston CBS affiliate KHOU.
Full Story: Revealed: Texas officials covered up dangerously radioactive tap water for years | Raw Story.
Just the other day, President Obama urged other countries to stop censoring the Internet. But now the United States Congress is trying to censor the Internet here at home. A new bill being debated this week would have the Attorney General create an Internet blacklist of sites that US Internet providers would be required to block. (The first vote is scheduled Thursday!)
This is the kind of heavy-handed censorship you'd expect from a dictatorship, where one man can decide what web sites you're not allowed to visit. But the Senate Judiciary Committee is expected to pass the bill as soon as they get back after the election -- and Senators say they haven't heard much in the way of objections! That's why we need you to sign our urgent petition to Congress demanding they oppose the Internet blacklist.
http://demandprogress.org/blacklist/?akid=15.45919.yrg-jl&rd=1&t=3 Regards,
proclus
http://www.gnu-darwin.org
This summer, thanks to a lawsuit brought by the Center for Biological Diversity and our allies, a Federal court directed Secretary Salazar to redo the analysis of the environmental impacts of a massive Bush-era oil and gas lease sale in the Chukchi Sea. But now, just two months later, Salazar has issued a draft document that leaves unanswered hundreds of questions about the impacts of drilling in the Arctic Ocean and the potential threat of a spill in those waters.
Don't let Secretary Salazar oil the Arctic. Please act now to tell Salazar that vulnerable Arctic species deserve better than his rushed and incomplete environmental analysis.
Visit http://action.biologicaldiversity.org/p/dia/action/public/?action_KEY=5162 to take action now.
Regards,
proclus
http://www.gnu-darwin.org/
Let me reiterate, there is no such thing as low penetration x-rays. If you walk through the scanners, you are risking your life. It is not worth it. Please stop.
Regards,
proclus
http://www.gnu-darwin.org/
I just took an important action for our environment, and I hope you will too. It's time for US companies to clean dirty Tar Sands oil from their transportation footprint. Companies as different as Whole Foods and Walgreens have acted to remove Canada’s Tar Sands from their footprint. Who's next?
Will you send a message to Walmart and Safeway today?
*** http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/281/p/dia/action/public/?action_KEY=2226
Oil from Canada's Tar Sands is worse than conventional fossil fuels in almost every way. In addition to its heavier carbon footprint, the Tar Sands also involve more toxic water discharges--and more acid rain and smog causing chemicals--than conventional sources. That destruction is being financed by fuel and transportation services linked to Canada’s Tar Sands oil.
Please, take action against the Tar Sands: http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/281/p/dia/action/public/?action_KEY=2226
Regards,
Michael L. Love Ph.D
Department of Biophysics and Biophysical Chemistry
School of Medicine
Johns Hopkins University
725 N. Wolfe Street
Room 608B WBSB
Baltimore MD 21205-2185
Interoffice Mail: 608B WBSB, SoM
Shipping Dock: 1915 E. Madison St.
office: 410-614-2267
lab: 410-614-3179
fax: 410-502-6910
cell: 443-824-3451
http://www.gnu-darwin.org/
![]() | |||
| |||
Join the Rally to Save KPFA's Hard Knock, Flashpoints & Full Circle! Sponsored by Full Circle, Hard Knock, Flashpoints and radical radio workers at KPFA. | |||
http://www2.answercoalition.org/site/MessageViewer?em_id=%26printer_friendly%3D1 | |||
View this message | |||
A.N.S.W.E.R. Coalition Click here to unsubscribe from the ANSWER e-mail list. If this message was forwared to you and you'd like to receive future ANSWER updates, |
Thanks to an interim court ruling in the Center's ongoing litigation, Interior Secretary Ken Salazar has until December 23 to reconsider the definition of an endangered species used by the Bush administration to deny polar bears endangered status despite the best science (which shows an overwhelming probability of extinction for two-thirds of the world's polar bears by 2050 and a high risk of extinction even within the next 10 to 20 years). This means we have a small window of time to convince Salazar to break with flawed Bush policies and upgrade protection of the polar bear from threatened to endangered. Please, ask Salazar to grant full endangered status to the polar bear today.
Visit http://action.biologicaldiversity.org/p/dia/action/public/?action_KEY=5133 to take action now.
![]() | |
| |
|
There are two imperiled populations of Atlantic bluefin tuna: one that spawns in the Gulf of Mexico and another that spawns in the Mediterranean. The petition seeks endangered status for both populations, which are intensely overfished due to demand for high-grade sushi. Scientists estimate that the Gulf of Mexico oil spill killed more than 20 percent of juvenile Atlantic bluefin tuna this year, further reducing an already-imperiled species.
We need your help to protect Atlantic bluefin tuna. Your letter will help persuade NMFS to act now before it's too late.
Visit http://action.biologicaldiversity.org/p/dia/action/public/?action_KEY=5116 to take action now.
I agree completely.
Regards,
proclus
http://www.gnu-darwin.org/
![]() | ||||||
| ||||||
Your donation. Matched. Dear ANSWER supporter, Right now, every dollar we raise counts. Twice. Starting immediately, donations made to the ANSWER Coalition via Paypal will be matched for a total of up to $5,000. If you don't have a Paypal account yet, you'll be given the option to create one—it only takes a minute. There could be no better time to support to the anti-war movement. Please make an urgently needed donation right now via Paypal.
| ||||||
http://www2.answercoalition.org/site/MessageViewer?em_id=%26printer_friendly%3D1 | ||||||
View this message | ||||||
A.N.S.W.E.R. Coalition If this message was forwarded to you and you'd like to receive future ANSWER updates, |
Regards,
proclus
http://www.gnu-darwin.org/
|
Many of us already know that Fox News is biased -- but it's actually
much worse than that. For years they have used lies, distortions, and
race-baiting to divide this country. Recently, it's gotten downright
dangerous. Earlier this summer, a heavily armed man got into a gun
fight with police after he was pulled over on his way to kill people
at the Tides Foundation[1] -- an obscure non-profit that Glenn Beck
regularly demonizes on his Fox News TV show.[2]
Fox News is bad news for America -- and it spreads, and is
legitimized, partly through TVs in public places.
That's why I've joined the TurnOffFox campaign -- the first part of a
larger campaign to diminish the influence of Fox. It's about educating
people about Fox and getting it turned off in stores, restaurants, and
other public places.
Will you join me? It takes just a moment to declare your own household
"Fox free", and at the same time appeal to public establishments in
your community to stop playing Fox. *And you'll get a FREE Turn Off
Fox sticker when you do.* Click here:
http://turnofffox.org/landing/?id=2483-1428787
No other news organization that's considered legitimate consistently
wages smear campaigns based on lies and race-baiting. But for years
Fox News has done exactly that, and the pattern has only gotten worse
since Barack Obama entered national politics.
Here are just a few examples:
-- A frequent Fox guest, Jesse Lee Peterson, said that the majority of
Black people have poor moral character, and cited "what they did to
the dome" after Hurricane Katrina as evidence.[3] Peterson has also
used his platform on Fox to claim that 90% of Black people are racists
-- against Whites.[4]
-- In a case of naked race-baiting, Fox host Glenn Beck called
President Obama a "racist" who had a "deep-seated hatred for White
people or the White culture."[5] Earlier that week, Beck claimed that
the President's health insurance reform proposals were a form of
"reparations" designed to "settle old racial scores."[6]
-- Fox host John Stossel argued that the public accommodations section
of the Civil Rights Act -- which prevents businesses from
discriminating based on race, sex, and other factors -- should be
repealed.[7]
-- Fox News hosts Bill O'Reilly and Sean Hannity were the first to air
deceptively edited and incomplete video of Shirley Sherrod's remarks
to the NAACP.[8] The video made it seem like Sherrod was confessing to
using her position at the USDA to discriminate against White farmers,
when she was really talking about the importance of overcoming
prejudice. Sherrod lost her job over this misrepresentation, which Fox
enthusiastically repeated without seeking the facts. Fox has since
tried to pretend it had nothing to do with this smear -- but Fox is
the number one reason these kinds of distortions and smears have any
part in our national dialogue.
The examples above aren't even a tenth of Fox's vicious lies and
smears, and over the years they've just gotten more brazen.
The goal of Turn Off Fox is to reduce the number of public TVs showing
Fox News, while spreading the word about Fox's poison (and how it
works) to those who don't know.
Signing up for the campaign is just the first step. We make it easy
for you to tell us about businesses playing Fox. If you're willing to
talk with them, we'll provide you with straightforward materials that
explain why they shouldn't be a party to what Fox is doing. And if
there are businesses you know that want to tell the world they would
never play Fox, you can help them declare themselves a "Fox-free
zone."
As businesses Turn off Fox and stand up as Fox Free, and as we
encourage our friends and family to do the same, we'll help make
clear, to people across the country, what Fox is about. And we'll
reduce their ability to do harm.
Please join me in signing up for the TurnOffFox campaign:
http://turnofffox.org/landing/?id=2483-1428787
Thanks.
References
1. http://bit.ly/a5F7kW
2. http://mediamatters.org/research/201007290032
3. http://mediamatters.org/research/200510030005
4. http://bit.ly/c060C0
5. http://mediamatters.org/research/200907300019
6. http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200907230040
7. http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/201005200033
8. http://mediamatters.org/blog/201007200060
If they're trying to influence your vote with election-season political ads, then you should know who they are.
Passage of the DISCLOSE Act (S.3295) would reveal the funders and restrict political ads by government contractors and foreign entities.
Public Citizen set up a page where you tell your senators in Congress to support this act at http://www.citizen.org/disclose-act-action.
Hi -- Do you know how far the fossil fuel industry is willing to go to protect their profits? Big polluters fight dirty. They blow smoke about the science of climate change and use scare tactics to slow the progress of clean energy -- costing us hundreds of thousands of jobs and putting our economy at risk. Like the people who sold "magic elixirs" in the Old West, they will say anything to part you from your money, even while they're peddling something toxic. That's why Repower America is presenting the 2010 Snake Oil Awards to shame the worst of the worst, and we get to decide who wins. I voted for Koch Industries because they have spent decades funding attacks on climate change science and our clean energy future. Join me and cast your vote for today: http://acp.repoweramerica.org/snakeoil-taf Let's show the fossil fuel industry that they can't get away with their lies any longer. Thanks! |
I cannot deny that there are possibly good reasons to execute a person, however; there is NO agency with the required infallibility and moral authority to carry out such executions. It is now known that the US carried out a vast number of wrongful executions, the ultimate injustice. We must put a stop to the horrendous practice of state executions. There are no exceptions.
Regards,
proclus
http://www.gnu-darwin.org/
Sakineh Ashtiani is on death row in Iran and at risk of execution by stoning. Last month, her lawyer and her son were arrested, apparently for discussing her case with foreign nationals. Her other lawyer, prominent human rights and death penalty defense lawyer Mohammad Mostafaei, was hounded into exile over the summer when he refused to be silenced.
In Singapore, Alan Shadrake is now a convicted criminal because he wrote a book about capital punishment in that country. He could be sent to prison next week.
While these episodes may be extreme, the same efforts to suppress information about the death penalty are at work here in the USA where, for instance, a state law in Missouri makes it a crime – even for journalists – to reveal the identities of those who participate in executions.
It’s the same principle of secrecy that allows Arizona and California to continue to conceal the source of their execution drugs, or for the Texas Department of Criminal Justice to call for such information to be classified as a “state secret.” The claim that such secrecy is necessary to protect executioners from harassment is incredibly weak. Other government agencies and employees (for example, the guy at the DMV who makes you wait in line, or the city employee who gives you parking tickets) don’t benefit from such undemocratic anonymity. The public has a fundamental right to know what a state agency is doing with their tax dollars, especially when that agency is engaged in the ultimate act of state power – the killing of a human being.
Most of us would agree (I hope) that lawyers should not be detained for publicizing their client’s case, and that no one should be punished for writing about a country’s death penalty (although that could happen under Missouri’s law). When government is exercising its greatest power, that’s when we should demand the greatest transparency. This is essential to ensuring accountability and preventing that power from being abused.
Instead, we are seeing, both globally and here in the USA, a disturbing trend towards imposing greater secrecy on the executions that are carried out in our name.
How did we get to such a place where attacking scientists and their work is not only acceptable, but helps win elections? And more importantly, what is UCS going to do about it?
First, we must acknowledge that these people didn't get into office on their own. They are backed by big oil, the coal industry, and electric utilities—opponents who have deep pockets and a singular goal of protecting their own interests.
UCS is going to continue to expose these polluting industries and their cronies who knowingly mislead the public about climate science. And we're going to challenge them to get their facts straight.
Because when it comes right down to it, the public's confidence in science and scientists remains high. In fact, just last night in California we saw a tangible example of science trumping industry spin, when voters thwarted an aggressive attempt by out-of-state oil companies to kill the state's landmark Global Warming Solutions Act.
It's examples like this that give me hope and remind me that we can—and will—still achieve concrete victories.
The truth of the matter is that it's been difficult to move Congress for months. The people who are supposed to be representing our interests in the nation's capitol have been too busy carrying water for narrow corporate interests rather than coming together to make real, positive change.
So we're moving forward, with them or without them. As the victory in California yesterday reminds us, there are plenty of other ways to effect change on the issues you and I care about. In the coming months, UCS will:
I am deeply grateful for your support of our work and look forward to tackling the challenges we have ahead of us together!
![]() | Sincerely,![]() Kevin Knobloch President |
UCS is a 501(c)(3) organization. All gifts are tax deductible. You can be confident your donations to UCS are spent wisely. ![]() | ![]() | Union of Concerned Scientists 2 Brattle Square Cambridge, MA 02138-3780 phone: 800-666-8276 | Fax: 617-864-9405 ucsaction@ucsusa.org www.ucsusa.org |