Showing posts with label pain. Show all posts
Showing posts with label pain. Show all posts

Tuesday, May 24, 2011

proclus : Michael L. Love: addressing backlash pain

proclus : Michael L. Love: addressing backlash pain

 

Michael L. Love: addressing backlash pain

 

There is an interesting phenomenon where pain killers might not work well under conditions I call prostaglandin crash: prostaglandins are already too low for Cox inhibitors such as aspirin, ibuprofen to have any effect.  This situation could relate to diabetic neuopathy and other types of neuropathy.  It may also relate to the unusual aches and pains that are sometimes experienced by people using calorie restriction (CR) related regimens like resveratrol or the parsley plan described elsewhere in this blog.  In both cases, prostaglandins may be unusually low, but for unrelated reasons, so that some pain treatments might not work. 

Prostaglandin crash is related, and may be the cause of another type of pain, which I call backlash pain.  You might have experienced this when using cough syrup.  Why does dextromethorphan (dxm) analgesia sometimes seem to make the pain or illness worse the next day?  This can also happen with morphine derivatives, and it is certainly related to their addictive potential.

Repressed function sometimes has a strong backlash.  For example, if a glutamate channel antagonist represses calcium release, then the calcium stores may continue to fill, so that there is a stronger activation after the antagonist wears off.  It is not difficult to imagine other types of repression/backlash events, and methamphetamine dependence is likely resulting from something similar as well, leading to dopamine depletion.

There are several possible strategies for reducing pain backlash.  In the case of the calcium stores, IP3 channel inhibition of some sort could prevent the backlash, as well as calcium pump inhibition.  Forskolin is obviously one such agent, which deactivates the IP3 channels.  It should be noted that forskolin also activates the voltage gated calcium channels.  If the calcium blockade results in too much potential, then these channels will open to rectify the situation, as it were, with a calcium transient.  One imagines that forskolin based regimens will not result in the elimination of pain, but rather its attenuation, and a reduction in backlash as well.  This has been consistent with my experience using the forskolin extract from NSI, which is one reason why I am recommending it as an adjunct to CR-related and parsley apigenin regimens.

Personally, there are a number of possible reasons why I am not experiencing pain backlash, and forskolin is likely one.  Another is the time-release formulation of dxm, and finally P450 inhibition by flavonoids, notably apigeinin, which keeps dxm in the system.

So we see that time release calcium channel antagonists is another possible strategy.  Anyone who has used valproate knows what I am talking about.  Another strategy is to identify other sources of calcium influx and repress them as well.  ATP receptor channel leaps to mind, and Blue #1 is apparently an effective agent for that.  In this case, it is extra-cellular calcium influx, like certain of the non-metabotropic glutamate receptors, which form channels.

Calcium influx is not the only issue, and the kinase activation which results from phospholipase activation may also be a source of repression/backlash.

Without anti-inflammatories, repression/backlash can be expected to result in more inflammatory factors being released, via the phospholipase/Cox pathway.  This may be an additional source of backlash.  It should be noted that flavonoids like parsley apigenin and other polyphenols like resveratrol may be sufficitent to suppress a backlash in prostaglandin production, without resort to anti-inflammatories.

In conclusion, a combination of CR-related regimen, dxm, and forskolin should address many pain management problems in a way that prevents the morning-after effect of prostaglandin crash and backlash pain.  Such a regimen may also find application for addiction treatment and recovery.

Regards,
proclus
http://www.gnu-darwin.org/

 

The blog

MOD

 

  • Michael L. Love: parsley and autism
  • Michael L. Love: parsley brownie
  • Michael L. Love: aspirin hiatus
  • Michael L. Love: citrus pudding recipe
  • Michael L. Love: parsley recipe alert!
  • Michael L. Love: parsley and bone loss
  • Michael L. Love: I Love You!
  • Michael L. Love: parsley and allergies follow-up
  • Michael L. Love: parsley and allergies
  • Michael L. Love: parsley and triglycerides
  • Michael L. Love: Parsley odyssey continues
  • Michael L. Love: Community blog to rss extraction code
  • Michael L. Love: winter bicycling
  • Michael L. Love: more parsley info, anti-diarrhea and other matters
  • Michael L. Love: Parsley recipe
  • Michael L. Love: polyphenols and stable free radicals
  • Michael L. Love: some bio info, blog links, plus some molecules site news
  • Michael L. Love: USDA Database for the Flavonoid Content
  • Michael L. Love: recipe; flax oil, tyrosol lignans update
  • Michael L. Love: Linus Pauling
  • Follow Michael L. Love:
    on Google Buzz

    Tuesday, November 23, 2010

    GNU-Darwin Action: Fourth Amendment Violation: Airport full-body X-ray image scanners - Rapiscan Systems

    Some facts in response to the misinformation that is out there regarding the airport X-ray scanners.

    It is incorrect to say that X-rays bounce off the body.  X-rays are noted for their ability to penetrate the body, and a small fraction bounces off.  The exposure numbers that have been produced by the current crop of public scanner defenders are absurdly low, and they are also inconsistent with the TSA commissioned study, which indicates that the X-ray dose is low but significant.  Critics have countered further that the exposure in the study was underestimated, and I am inclined to agree.  The level of radiation that is required to resolve a backscatter image is not insignificant, and likely amounts to a substantial dose.  Further study is indicated, but we should not forget that the aim is to eliminate the scanners from our airports. 

    If you have a comparable exposure from in-flight radiation, this is another reason not to fly.  If the in-flight exposure is higher, then you have more reason not to fly.  There are many good reasons not to fly, which have been building up over the decades, such as the pollution, the fuel cost and utilization, the greenhouse effect, the terrorist threat, and the adverse reaction that we see in US foreign and domestic policy.  All of this to say nothing of the Fourth Amendment violation, which is a daily occurrence in our airports.  Much has been made of the fact that the machines are not configured to save images.  Is the operator monitored to be sure that he is not taking a picture of the screen with his cell phone?   Do we really believe that modifying the software could resolve the underlying privacy issue? 

    Supporters of the scanner technology tend to dodge the question of long term effects, and this is no surprise.  If I were them, I would dodge it too.  The long term effects are likely to be devastating for the unlucky few who get various cancers and other maladies from these scanners, to say nothing about vulnerable subpopulations, such as smokers, pregnant women, children, and people with pre-existing conditions such as; cancer and thyroid problems.  What about the male germ-line cells, which can be expected to receive a larger dose than the rest of the body.  X-rays are known to be mutagenic.

    The truth is that this technology was promoted by vocal and powerful wealthy minority that values airport security over our health and safety.  Their aim is that we take all the risk, and they enrich themselves by taking all the benefit.  The rest of us should band together and put a stop to these outrages now.   I am seeing widespread opposition to the new security measures across a very wide base which transcends many other issues.  Act now, and we can stop this.  Act now, or you will see the scanners in schools, banks, and other public places. Act now, or else they will become ubiquitous and unavoidable, everywhere.

    If you are ready for action, here are some suggestions that you may not have thought of.  If you must continue to fly, complain to the TSA and Homeland Security, and ask them to stop these practices.  Voice your opposition to TSA officers.  Stop flying altogether and send the right message to the airlines.  Don't be fooled by the false dichotomy between scanning and groping.  Refuse both.  If you are TSA officer, stop what you are doing, because it is a Fourth Amendment violation.  Refuse to indulge in this wrongful and unpopular act.  If you are a federal officer, obey your oath and defend the Constitution against this outrage.  Everyone should spread their dissatisfaction to everyone else that they know.  THINK, and come up with your own actions.  Act now, not later.

    Regards,
    proclus
    http://www.gnu-darwin.org/

    Saturday, May 29, 2010

    Untitled

    watch out superman not flying! bp diet food foss gulf pain oilspill boycottbp http://ping.fm/y3zII

    Posted via web from proclus-gnu-darwin's posterous